The following is an extract from facebook provided to me by a bosom friend of mine C. M. Kapoor, a stalwart in banking arena and trade union movement. The extract so appended is self explanatory and warrants to be gone through its contents thoroughly. The pensioners, the retirees and the readers in general are called upon to strictly follow the last paragraph marked ## and see that the relative message reaches maximum possible number of people from general awareness angle. The fact that a galaxy of as many as 21 advocates of Supreme Court of India have readily sponsored their services to the cause of pensioners free of cost is most important a lead and deserves applause as an acknowledgemnt. Let us all be sincerely thankful to them.
Sir, please see this article.
Banks Retirees : Supreme Court decision- 50% to all.
Sukhvinder Singh to All Banks Retirees Friends CLUB.
Agra, India ·
An imp msg received from Shri H. I. Jani, ( AGM rtrd. and Asso. Activist) frweded for info.
FOR INFORMATION OF ALL PENSIONERS
Forwarded as received:-
OROP.. LEGAL HELP..
Mr Dushyant Dave, President of Supreme Court Bar Association has said that all 21 Lawyers of the SCBA are ready to represent the Veterans in SC on OROP Pro- Bono (Pro-Bono means without cost to the applicant)
THIS IS AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE IN RETIRED BANKERS GOOGLE BLOG
It is surprising that a land mark judgement delivered by the Supreme Court of India on 01 07 2015, Civil Appeal no. 1123 of 2015 has gone unnoticed and except for a brief letter from Shri S R Sen Gupta to IBA, no other union has taken any steps. The salient features of the judgement:
1. The bench has authoritatively ruled that Pension is a right and the payment of it does not depend upon the discretion of the Government. Pension is governed by rules and a Government Servant coming within those rules is entitled to claim pension.
2.The judgement has recognised that the revision of pension and revision of pay scales are INSEPARABLE.
3.The bench has reiterated that on revision the Basic pension cannot be less than 50% of the Basic Pension in the minimum of the Pay Band in the revised scale corresponding to the pre-revised scale.
4.The government CANNOT take a plea of financial burden to deny legitimate dues of the pensioners.
5.The Government SHOULD AVOID unwarranted litigation and not to encourage any litigation for the sake of litigation.
6. When pension is upheld to be a right and NOT A BOUNTY, as a corollary to the averment that revision of pension and revision of pay scales are INSEPARABLE, upgradation of pension is also a RIGHT AND NOT A BOUNTY.
THE JUDGEMENT IS BASED ON THE DECISION ON D S NAKARA CASE.
The above details are available in the latest issue of Canara Bank Retired Officer’s Association Circular no 3/2016 dated 1st August 2015.
The judgement is very clear and I wonder how no one has noticed the important aspects and why no one has taken up the matter with the IBA/Govt.
Why no one has reacted to the judgement is surprising and perplexing.
While agitation is on why can’t we take recourse to court also as Supreme Court advocates are offering their services. One ruling by SC that govt can’t deny pension for lack of funds regarding OROP every year and VRS case
##Forward this msg to a minimum of twenty people on your contact list; and in turn ask each of them to do likewise.
In three days, most people in India will have this message.
This is one idea that really should be passed around.
For information of all.