Some of my readers asked me to write something elaborate on negotiations between the managements and the unions. This is a topic which can’t be given a set pro forma containing advices like ‘do it’ and ‘don’t’ do it. Every thing depends on the individual issue –it’s merits and demerits. Stories and situations can’t be pre conceived on a notional basis, they are actually to be taken up the way they so emerge. In generality, volumes can be written on this topic, but in practical terms the specifics have to be provided as requisite narratives forming necessary feed back on a particular situation that generated the very issue so involved. One thing is of course very clear that both the parties –the management representatives and representatives from the side of the union concerned, have to be fully equipped with a logically trusted reasoning while putting forth their view points in course of talks. The party which lacks it is bound to flop in negotiations with a total nullity as a result. Any kind of prejudice on the part of any party is detrimental to the very result of the discussions. There are two types of prejudices –one on the part of the management where they suffer from the ego of their power, authority and resources, and the other one on the part of the union where they have enormous man power in the shape of work force behind them always prepared to launch any kind of a movement in support of their demands. Who has what strength at their command is a factor to be applied only when the talks fail, but the talks should not fail should be the point of approach for both the sides, as if talks succeed any action or movement is out of question. And to ensure that the talks are a success, the parties concerned must adhere to reasoning and logic based discussion instead of behaving in a free styled manner.
The main essence of the blog is “One thing is of course very clear that both the parties –the management representatives and representatives from the side of the union concerned, have to be fully equipped with a logically trusted reasoning while putting forth their view points in course of talks.”—very well said.
LikeLike
Sir, “Shree Ganesha” for both the management and budding trade union leaders
LikeLike
Nice advice.
LikeLike
Very nice covering of labour problems
LikeLike
Sir in-fact your readers and followers want to go back and live in ‘M. R. Awasthi era’ which they have enjoyed and witnessed. But that seems not possible. Repeated by thousands of people at thousands times i also want to repeat.
Hazaron saal Nargis
apni benury pe roti hai
Badi mushkil se hota hai
Chaman me didawar paida
You have advised to be logical, trustworthy, selfless and honest in approach. Are these qualities available in both sides? Sir you are the best judge.
Honorable Gangal has very rightly commented ‘Shri Ganesh’ for both.
Om Namo Vighnesh
LikeLike
Dear Mr. B.N.Dubey,your comment is very nice,it is not only nice,but what ever you written in your comment,is based on the fact.I can very well understand your concern. I certainly admire your skill of expressing the things.
LikeLike
Thanks Sir for inspiring expressions….
LikeLike
Nice advice.
LikeLike
Nothing is left for comment after comment of Mr.B.N.Dubey and Mr. Prakash Gangal. How ever I must say that the Blog is very valluable for both the side, setting aside their draw backs.In fact this Blog should be taken as guide lines by the representative of Union & Management as well.
LikeLike
reasonable talks are obligatory for eventual success of any argument and witnessing the intricacy of the present matter really ”negotiations sans reasoning”.
LikeLike
Good evening Sir. I am new add to your blog.
LikeLike
A very hearty welcome to you. My sincere thanks.
LikeLike
You are text book on this craft.
LikeLike
Mr.Shyam Mohan Mishra,I read your comment on an article of Mr. Neelkanth “Negotiations Sans Reasoning”which apparenyly appears a tiny comment based on only three words = text, book & craft but in fact it has very vast meaning in it self.Writing skill which I observe in your this Tiny comment is of course admirable.
LikeLike